Is the kidnapping of Meng Wanzhou (from Huawei) a turning point?

Is the kidnapping of Meng Wanzhou, a senior executive of Huawei, a turning point?

Let us leave aside the cowardly Canadians bending to the capricious will of a declining United States, or the increasingly ineffective sanctions that the USA slaps on all and sundry, and consider what I have elsewhere called China’s dialectical leap into the future.

Huawei’s technological breakthroughs are only one – albeit important – aspect of a much larger process. Having been the first to test successfully a 5G communication, Huawei has developed a whole process that enables it to roll out a complete network in countries keen to get hold of it. 5G will make wifi and national broadband networks obsolete. How has it been able to achieve this, along with superior technology all the way from smart phones to undersea cables? Of its 180,000 employees, more than half are involved in research and development. Has it done so through ‘intellectual property theft‘? Not at all, but through the active incentives of a communist party in China that knows such developments take place only with significant government support.

Yet, Huwaei is only one example of a whole range of technological breakthroughs that have been happening in China over the last few years. I will not go into the full range of these here, but will focus on wider social and political questions. This is because the dialectical leap is taking place not merely on a technological level.

Socially, the symbiosis – as many are now recognising – between traditional China culture and Marxism means that Chinese culture today means Marxist Chinese culture. The old Confucian four-character saying, ‘all under heaven is as common [tianxia wei gong]’ has been appropriated and reinterpreted in light of communism’s focus on the ‘common’. This has massive implications at all levels, from the share economy through a Chinese Marxist approach to human rights (in which economic wellbeing is the basic right) to core socialist values.

Politically, all of this is taking place precisely under the strong leadership of Xi Jinping. Call it what you will, but the reality is that a good dose of communist authoritarianism is precisely what China has needed in the last six years. The result: on average, 90 percent of people in China are confident of the direction in which the country is headed, and 84 percent of people at all levels have trust in the government and public institutions (as the Ipsos and Edelman poll agregates indicate). This entails confidence to innovate and take risks, with quite stunning results.

Back to the kidnapping of Meng Wanzhou: this is an extraordinarily clumsy move that will backfire in so many ways. Only time will tell, but this may well be the moment when countries like the United States, the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand (a small gaggle that once upon a time called the shots) really do begin to fall behind in a very noticeable way. By contrast, those keen to engage with and make use of Chinese breakthroughs may well begin to leap ahead as well. The candidates are many indeed, from Russia through Africa and Central Asia to Latin America. Now that would be a different world.

 

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “Is the kidnapping of Meng Wanzhou (from Huawei) a turning point?

  1. For decades, the western nations have been keen to use cheap Chinese labour to manufacture their goods for a wealthy home market. But as the economy of Europe and America changed, they now fear the rise of Chinese technology, and the buying power of such a populous nation. A window on the future would surely show the Chinese Economy dominant across the world.
    Now those fading imperialist nations are trying to stop that becoming a reality.
    Best wishes, Pete.

  2. sitting here in canada listening to views about china as an evil dictatorship filter all things related to this case. also, china, and huawei, is a security threat (theoretically!). one of the favourite talking points today is that trudeau is ‘naive on china’. blah blah!
    help! we need some different news on this topic. and i cant find any… ive appreciated your perspectives a lot on this issue and many others.. if u have a moment can u suggest other reading suggestions? blogs, news sites, etc., that can help us canadians and americans (and all the other declining colonial powers) combat our own state and corporate talking points relating to china? china comes up a lot here
    regarding our own political struggles with oil and pipelines, but the real geopolitical perspectives are lost in simplistic racializations of china as a big evil country threatening our sovereignty…
    anyways, appreciate your blog and very interested in your broader research program! take
    care

    1. In Australia it is known as the ‘two-colour peril’: the deeply racist ‘yellow peril’ and the anti-communist ‘red peril’ – with the irrational assumption that the CPC is inherently evil.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.